|
|||||||||||||||||||
Guest Columns Perspective: Modeling changing times for dairyJohn Umhoefer John Umhoefer is executive director of the Wisconsin Cheese Makers Association. He contributes this column monthly for Cheese Market News®. A new administration in Washington, D.C., means change is here, and the best antidote for business uncertainty inherent in change is data. Charles Nicholson, associate professor and Ph.D. agricultural economist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, offered new analysis of modeled impacts of potential new federal polices at the Renk Ag Outlook Forum in Madison on Jan. 21. His talk offered preliminary data — look for his final conclusions online at DairyMarkets.org soon. Here’s a topline of his Jan. 21 data as you prepare for change. • Modeling new tariffs Dr. Nicholson focused on the potential for new tariff skirmishes with Mexico, Canada and China, three countries that purchased more than 40% of the total value of U.S. dairy exports in 2024. If the U.S. increases average tariff rates by 25% on dairy product imports from those countries, Dr. Nicholson proposed, and these countries respond with similar counter tariffs on dairy goods coming from the U.S., then the “Dynamic Global Dairy Supply Chain Model” at UW-Madison draws these conclusions: • A $2.4 billion reduction in cumulative U.S. dairy farm net income; • Modeling labor changes Dr. Nicholson then turned his model on the issue of labor supply in the dairy industry. He told the Any negative change in labor supply can increase wage rates and lower productivity per worker during transitions, and Dr. Nicholson derived cost impacts from changes to these labor variables: • A $4.4 billion reduction in cumulative U.S. dairy farm net income; In conversation with Dr. Nicholson, he noted that the best use of this modeled data is to note the trends in prices and values, rather than the absolute values. • Modeling nutrition programs Dr. Nicholson applied the university model to food and nutrition programs, including the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC), School Lunch and Breakfast Programs, and the Healthy Fluid Milk Incentives. He estimates that just under 10% of fluid milk in the U.S. is consumed through school-based programs. Fluid milk and cheese are the most frequently purchased dairy products under SNAP. To analyze the impact of financial cuts to these programs, Dr. Nicholson selected a reduction of 50% in these programs, or 4% of demand for fluid milk and cheese, yielding: • A $3.6 billion reduction in U.S. dairy farm net income; Placing all of these variables in the model together, Dr. Nicholson reported these outputs: • A $5.5 billion reduction in U.S. dairy farm net income; While no model can predict the future dairy economy with certainty, learning trends and trajectories for prices and earnings is useful fodder for planning in times of change. CMN The views expressed by CMN’s guest columnists are their own opinions and do not necessarily reflect those of Cheese Market News®. |
|
||||||||||||||||||
© 2025 Cheese Market News • Quarne Publishing, LLC • Legal Information • Online Privacy Policy • Terms and Conditions |
|||||||||||||||||||